Nordyke v. Charlton & Stalker
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Keokuk District Court. — HoN. Ben McCoy, Judge. ActioN aided by attachment to recover the amount due on a promissory note. The writ of attachment was levied on six promissory notes and other property, a receiver was appointed to take charge of the attached property, and judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the amount due on the notes.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Keokuk District Court. — HoN. Ben McCoy, Judge. ActioN aided by attachment to recover the amount due on a promissory note. The writ of attachment was levied on six promissory notes and other property, a receiver was appointed to take charge of the attached property, and judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the amount due on the notes. Thereafter twenty-two persons intervened, claiming liens on the attached property by virtue of attachments in their favor, and their liens and that of the plaintiff were adjudged to be co-ordinate and equal. Two years later A.…
1Opinion of the Court
BobiNson, O. J.
— This cause was tried in the district court on a stipulation as to the facts. From that it appears that when this action was commenced and when the proceedings involved in it were had, the makers of the notes in controversy resided in Hitchcock county, in the state of Nebraska. The defendant Charlton & Stalker is a partnership which is said to have conducted a bank at Eiehland, in this state, and was never located in Nebraska, nor did it-ever transact business in that state. A. C. Charlton and Allen Stalker, who compose the firm and are defendants, never resided in Nebraska,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harvey v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Wyeth Hardware & Manufacturing Co. v. H. F. Lang & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Pelham v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Callanan v. Brown & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Hughes v. MontySupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hobgood v. SylvesterOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Haulman v. CrumalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Skalecki v. FrederickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Great Western Finance Co. v. Hamilton National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924