Legal Opinion

Hobgood v. Sylvester

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1965PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

Plaintiff commenced an action to recover an alleged debt from nonresident defendants. To obtain quasi-in-rem, jurisdiction over the defendants, plaintiff sought to attach a debt owed them by third-party Oregon residents. Prom an order quashing the return of service upon motion made by way of a special appearance, plaintiff appeals.

The debt sought to be attached in these proceedings was the unpaid balance of the purchase price of land, which debt had been evidenced by a negotiable promissory note and secured by a mortgage on the land. In answer to the notice of garnishment, the garnishees…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Fishburn v. LondershausenOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Willis v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  5. Whitney v. DayOregon Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Taylor v. RoederSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  2. Investment Service Co. v. Martin Bros. Container & Timber Products Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Fidelity Bank, National Ass'n v. AvrutickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  4. Investment Service Co. v. SmitherOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Carlos Warehouse v. ThomasSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API