State v. Keehn
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted by the grand jury for the crime of unlawfully, feloniously, wilfully and knowingly resisting an officer in the performance of his duty in serving process upon defendant and his wife, tried before Daly, J., and a jury which found him guilty as charged in the indictment. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.
Defendant was convicted of the crime of resisting an officer in the execution of his duties, and appeals to this court from an order denying a new trial.
The first contention is. that the evidence was not sufficient to sustain a verdict of guilty. It disclosed these facts: A petition was filed in the probate court of Yellow Medicine county alleging that a child of defendant was in a dependent, neglected and delinquent condition. The court, acting as a juvenile court, issued a summons and notice to defendant and his wife, requiring them to appear before the court at a stated time and place,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. NewmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. Wong SunMontana Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. BowersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- State v. WhitmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926