Legal Opinion

People v. Masters

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 5, 1933No. Docket No. 2378PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DESMOND, J., pro tem.

The defendant, convicted by a jury of first degree burglary, seeks a reversal on the grounds of insufficiency of the evidence, refusal of the court to give one of his requested instructions and the admission of certain evidence hereinafter mentioned in some detail. The appeal is also from the order of the trial court denying a new trial.

The complaining witness, one Anderson, had a room upon the sixth floor of a hotel in Los Angeles. Shortly after midnight of February 2, 1933, he went to bed, leaving his trousers on a chair in his room. In a pocket of his trousers was a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. MayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. People v. VasquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. People v. HelmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. United States v. BoydU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
  4. People v. SlaterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. People v. SlaterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API