Legal Opinion

United States v. Boyd

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided October 14, 1983No. ACM S25958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Senior Judge:

Absent a defense request for an alibi instruction, must the military judge give one sua sponte? This is the question before us. We hold that — without a defense request — a military judge does not err by failing to give such an instruction.

The accused was found guilty by a special court-martial, with members, of conspiracy to commit larceny and larceny, in violation of Articles 81 and 121, U.C.M.J., 10 U.S.C. §§ 881 and 921. The approved sentence was a bad conduct discharge (suspended), confinement at hard labor for two months, forfeiture of $382.00 per month for…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Goldsby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. United States v. GravesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  4. United States v. TramaglinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  5. United States v. Sylvester AtkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. FisherU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
  2. State v. HopkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. United States v. StaffordU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API