Legal Opinion

Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of Fresno

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 2005No. F044561PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VARTABEDIAN, J.

This is an appeal from judgment for plaintiffs and respondents Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association and others (collectively plaintiffs), entered on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Appellant City of Fresno (Fresno) contends on appeal that its assessment of a fee in lieu of property taxes upon its own utility departments is unaffected by Proposition 218, the Right to Vote on Taxes Act, approved by the voters in 1996. Plaintiffs contend the fee is prohibited by Proposition 218, as the trial court ruled. We conclude the fee, in its present form, violates the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Apartment Ass'n of L.A. Cty. Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Richmond v. Shasta Community Services DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of RosevilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Citizens for Fair REU Rates v. City of ReddingCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Capistrano Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of San Juan CapistranoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Griffith v. Pajaro Valley Water Management AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Moore v. City of Lemon GroveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API