Legal Opinion

Firkus v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 5, 1976No. 45950Published

1Opinion of the Court

246 N.W.2d 864 (1976)

Eileen A. FIRKUS, Widow of Alexander T. Firkus, Deceased Employee, Relator,

v.

James J. MURPHY, Respondent,

State Treasurer, Custodian of the Special Compensation Fund, Respondent.

No. 45950.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

November 5, 1976.

Rehearing Denied November 30, 1976.

Robins, Davis & Lyons and Arnold M. Bellis, St. Paul, Carter & Carter and Robert C. Carter, Roseau, for relator.

Adlai Brink, Baudette, for Murphy.

Warren Spannaus, Atty. Gen., Peter Sipkins, Sol. Gen., Winston Ehlmann, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for State.

Heard before PETERSON, MacLAUGHLIN, and SCOTT, JJ., and…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holm v. H & S ASPHALT CO.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Steinhaus v. AdamsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Nierengarten v. State, Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. Dobosenski v. Carlton CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  5. Firkus v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API