Legal Opinion

Firkus v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 5, 1976No. 45950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

On certiorari to the Workers’ Compensation Board relator, the widow of Alexander T. Firkus, challenges the finding of the commission that her husband was not at the time of his death acting as an employee of James J. Murphy. We affirm.

Murphy, an independent timber logger who was engaged in a rush logging project, became stalled in the woods on March 28,1972, when his automobile malfunctioned. He walked several miles from the woods to a forest ranger station where his wife and decedent Firkus found him. Firkus gave him a ride home. Early the next morning, Firkus, Murphy’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holm v. H & S ASPHALT CO.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Steinhaus v. AdamsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Dobosenski v. Carlton CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Unlimited Horizon Marketing, Inc. v. Precision Hub, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  2. Firkus v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API