Legal Opinion

Holm v. H & S ASPHALT CO.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 2, 1969No. 41490PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

The Workmen’s Compensation Commission denied relator’s claim for compensation, based upon its determinative finding of fact that relator was not at the time of his injury an employee of respondent H & S Asphalt Company, a corporation.

Relator, who had been the sole proprietor of an asphalt paving business for several years, formed the corporation to conduct the same business. He turned over to the corporation his road equipment, valued at its tax basis of $46,475; in exchange, the corporation issued to him its capital stock in the amount of $20,000 and entered upon its books,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Corcoran v. PG Corcoran Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Erickson v. Erickson Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Preese v. Boy Scouts of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jelso v. World Balloon Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Great Southwest Fire Insurance v. Hercules Building & Wrecking Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  3. McFarland v. BollingerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Treadwell v. A-O Machine Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. Ward v. American Leg. Edw. B. Cutter Post 102, AnokaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API