Legal Opinion

McGrath v. Stevenson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1938No. 26784. En BancPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

The plaintiff, claiming to be an abutting owner on the vacated portion of Miramar avenue, instituted this action to set aside the order of the board of county commissioners of King county authorizing the vacation of a portion of Miramar avenue on the petition of Birt F. Fisher and others, and to enjoin the defendants from obstructing that avenue or interfering with the plaintiff in the use of that road.

The cause was tried to the court, which found that the petition for the vacation of a part of the road in question was not signed, as the statute (Rem. Rev. Stat., § 6503 [P. C. § 6061])…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kemp v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Cooke v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Walker v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Wichert v. CardwellWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Dumas v. GagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Dumas v. GagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Ex parte RachiellSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API