Legal Opinion

Pettinger v. Carroll

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2018No. 20170376PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jensen, Justice.

[¶ 1] Robert Pettinger ("Pettinger") appeals from a district court judgment dismissing his lawsuit against the estate of his brother, James Pettinger ("the Estate"). The court granted summary judgment in favor of the Estate, concluding Pettinger's lawsuit was untimely and barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Pettinger contends material questions of fact exist precluding summary judgment. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In August 2016, following the denial of Pettinger's claim against the Estate, Pettinger sued John Carroll, personal representative of the Estate. Pettinger alleged…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wells v. First American Bank WestNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Darby v. SWENSON, INC.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. A. R. Audit Services, Inc. v. TuttleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Ruud v. FrandsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Larson v. Midland Hospital Supply, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dahms v. Nodak Mutal Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Becker v. Burleigh CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Cuozzo v. State, d/b/a University of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Broten v. CarterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Heartland State Bank v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API