Legal Opinion

Dahms v. Nodak Mutal Insurance Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 2018No. 20180202PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VandeWalle, Chief Justice.

[¶1] Scott and Shannon Dahms appealed from a summary judgment dismissing their action against Nodak Mutual Insurance Company to obtain additional insurance payments, and against their insurance agent, Mike Bruckbauer, for damages resulting from his alleged violation of professional duties owed to them. Because the district court correctly interpreted the insurance policy as applied to the undisputed facts, and because the Dahms failed to raise a genuine issue of fact to support their professional negligence claim, we affirm.

I

[¶2] In 2008 the Dahms purchased a Nodak…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Elie Nassar and Rhonda Nassar v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Group, Dave Baker, Mary Hamilton, and Marcus SmithTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  2. K & L Homes, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Porco v. Lexington InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  4. Rawlings v. FruhwirthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Forsman v. Blues Brews and Bar-B-Ques Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Miller v. Nodak Ins. Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  2. Frontier Fiscal Services LLC v. Pinky's Aggregates, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. N. D. Private Investigative & Sec. Bd. v. Tigerswan, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Becker v. Burleigh CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Cuozzo v. State, d/b/a University of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API