Legal Opinion

Ruud v. Frandson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 2005No. 20050049PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Dan Frandson appealed from a declaratory judgment holding he does not farm the cropland he inherited under his mother’s will, thus enabling his sister, Karen Ruud, to exercise her option to purchase the cropland under a clause in the will. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Alice Frandson died testate in November of 1987. The last will and testament left certain parcels of real estate to her son Dan Frandson. Alice Frandson placed certain conditions on this bequest. The condition at issue in this case provides:

In the event that Dan chooses not to farm any or all of the cropland…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stormon v. WeissNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Fleck v. Jacques Seed Co., Prescott, WisconsinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Lochthowe v. C.F. Peterson EstateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Tormaschy v. TormaschyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Mann v. ZabolotnyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Moody v. SundleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Gadeco, LLC v. Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Pettinger v. CarrollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. McNamara v. FeistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. EstradaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API