Legal Opinion
Ross v. Jones
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 18, 1933No. 24470. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
Respondent, as plaintiff, brought this action to foreclose a mortgage dated July 7,1930, given to secure the payment of a note of even date therewith for seventeen thousand dollars made by the defendants Jones to his order. Appellants Laberee were made defendants upon the theory that they had some interest or title in or to the mortgaged lands which were subsequent and junior to the mortgage.
The Laberees answered the complaint, making admissions and denials, and affirmatively alleged that the note and mortgage were wholly without consideration, were made with fraudulent intent and were void…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eddy v. London Assurance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Carroll v. Hartford Fire InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
- Savings Bank of Ansonia v. SchancuppSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Oregon Mortgage Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Young Men's Lyceum of Tarrytown v. National Ben Franklin Fire Insurance of PittsburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. USF InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Transamerica Title Insurance v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co. v. USF Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.