Hollingshead v. Morris
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Murphy, J. Assumpsit by Giotto Hollingshead and another against Isaiah S. Morris for breach of a contract or option for the sale of real property. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.
From a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, the defendant has brought the case here by writ of error.
With one exception there is no substantial disagreement as to the material facts of the case. That exception will be mentioned later. The defendant was the owner of the Abbey Apartments. He listed them with one Keyes for sale. He did not give Mr. Keyes any written authority to sell them. Prior to June 6,1911, the plaintiff Hollingshead had been interested with one C. F. Doying of Toledo in real estate transactions. Mr. Hollingshead, without the knowledge of Mr. Doying, dictated to a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Scott v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Smith & Fleek's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
- Wilkinson v. HeavenrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Cooper v. Lansing Wheel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Mull v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Detroit Postage Stamp Service Co. v. SchermackMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Pangburn v. SiffordMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Martin v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Burstein v. AlldisMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- South Branch Cheese Co. v. American Butter & Cheese Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.