Detroit Postage Stamp Service Co. v. Schermack
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Mandell, J. Assumpsit by the Detroit Postage Stamp Service Company against Joseph J. Schermack and another for the recovery of the price paid for certain vending machines. Judgment for defendants upon a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This is an action of assumpsit to recover $562.50, and interest, claimed to be due the plaintiff, as representing the amount paid to defendant by the plaintiff for 37 stamp-selling machines; the defendant having failed to deliver to plaintiff 16 new twin type machines, to which the plaintiff claimed *268it was entitled, in exchange for the 37 machines first mentioned, under the following contract, known as Exhibit A. On October 7, 1910, the defendants entered into a contract with Arthur F. Mercer:
“The Schermack Company,
“Mailing Room Specialists,
“72 State Street, Detroit.
“October 7, 1910.
“Mr.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Arkansas Valley Smelting Co. v. Belden Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Delaware County Commissioners v. Diebold Safe & Lock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Richardson v. HardwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- R. R. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Atlantic & North Carolina Railroad v. Atlantic & North Carolina Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- H-D Michigan, LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Hy King Associates, Inc. v. Versatech Manufacturing Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
- County of Lyon v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Board of Trustees of Michigan State University v. Research Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1995
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Cuvrell (In Re F & T Contractors, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.