Legal Opinion
Roth v. Maryland Cas. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 7, 1954No. 11152_1PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court sitting without a jury wherein Roth, the appellant, was allowed a partial recovery of his claims against Maryland Casualty Company, the appel-lee. 1 2 The basis of jurisdiction is diversity of citizenship.
Roth, trading as Roth & Company, a securities broker in Allentown, Pennsylvania, during all times here material was insured by appellee under an indemnity bond of a type known as a broker’s blanket bond. From 1942 until November, 1947, Roth had in his employ as office manager one Harry L. Fletcher. The latter…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Paddleford v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. LevineCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- Harris v. National Surety Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Earl v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Degener v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Scott Hammersmith v. Tig Insurance Company (w.d. Of Pa. Civil Nos. 02-Cv-01829 & 03-Cv-01333)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Crawford v. Manhattan L. Ins. Co. of NYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. MarshbankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Jamison v. Miracle Mile Rambler, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- The Continental Corporation v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.