Legal Opinion

Degener v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 14, 1937No. 6364PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In a state court, Chaplin & Co. brought suit against the defendant insurance company to recover damages sustained by it for which defendant, as alleged, was liable on its indemnity bond given to the plaintiff. No facts being in dispute, the case was heard by the court on the plaintiff’s motion for judgment for want, as was alleged, of a sufficient affidavit of defense. After hearing, the court, in an opinion1 entered judgment for the defendant. Whereupon plaintiff took this appeal.

The pleaded pertinent facts are that plaintiff, a stock brokerage firm, was requested…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Roth v. Maryland Cas. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  2. Sutro Bros. & Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  3. Paddleford v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  4. Imperial Insurance, Incorporated, American Homeowners Insurance Company v. The Employers' Liability Assurance Corporation, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  5. Levin v. DareDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API