Legal Opinion
Kronman v. Kronman
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 19, 1933No. Docket No. 8762PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JORGENSEN, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from an order of the court below setting aside the final decree of divorce in this action on the ground that the same was secured by fraud of the defendant.
The plaintiff obtained an interlocutory decree of divorce from defendant by default, on her complaint alleging extreme cruelty. This decree was entered August 3, 1927. Thereafter, on the twenty-sixth day of November, 1930, the plaintiff filed a second action for divorce upon the same grounds of cruelty as alleged in the case at bar, and in addition to the acts alleged in this case added an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McGuinness v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- In Re Estate of BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Olson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Williams v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Estate of EstremCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- King v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Martínez v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
- Deyl v. DeylCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Shinn v. ShinnNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.