Legal Opinion

State v. Abeyta

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 15, 1983No. C6-83-678PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

In State v. Abeyta, 328 N.W.2d 443 (Minn.1983), we affirmed defendant’s conviction of assault with a dangerous weapon, reckless discharge of a firearm, possession of a sawed-off shotgun and possession of brass knuckles, but we remanded for resen-tencing in light of State v. Olson, 325 N.W.2d 13 (Minn.1982), because the trial court erroneously concluded that it had no choice under Minn.Stat. § 609.11 (1982) but to sentence defendant to a minimum of 3 years in prison (which translated into a 54-month Guidelines sentence) for the assault conviction. On remand a hearing was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. State v. BrusvenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. State v. KraftSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. BackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. State v. BertschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. State v. PatricelliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. FrostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. State v. YantCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API