Legal Opinion

McGonigle

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 29, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

This is a petition under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 231, § 117, to establish the plaintiff’s exceptions directed to an order of the trial judge that judgment be entered for the defendant in the case of McGonigle v. Reynolds. A jury trial had resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff. The judge reserved leave to enter a verdict for the defendant in accordance with G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 231, § 120. The plaintiff did not file any bill of exceptions within twenty days after the verdict. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 231, § 113. She was obliged to do this, if she wished to preserve any exceptions she might have taken…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Atlas Mortgage Co. v. TebaldiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Vallavanti v. Armour & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. Hacking v. Coӧrdinator of the Emergency Relief DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Higgins v. First National Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  2. Boyle v. Cambridge Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API