Legal Opinion

Boyle v. Cambridge Gas Light Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 4, 1956Published

1Opinion of the Court

Exceptions overruled. The defendant’s exceptions were sustained in each of these three cases for the reason that there was no evidence of negligence, and rescripts were sent down on January 19, 1954, ordering the entry of judgments for the defendant. 331 Mass. 56. The plaintiffs contend that during the trial they saved exceptions to the exclusion of evidence which, if admitted, would have shown negligence upon the part of the defendant. The plaintiffs, however, never perfected their exceptions. See McGonigle, petitioner, 317 Mass. 262. The merits of these exceptions have never been before…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Hartmann v. Boston Herald-Traveler Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  3. Boyle v. Cambridge Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  4. Vallavanti v. Armour & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. McGonigleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API