Legal Opinion

Vallavanti v. Armour & Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 11, 1928PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is a petition to establish the truth of exceptions. It arises in this way: Pursuant to decision in this case reported in 260 Mass. 4Í7, by rescript dated June 30, 1927, the clerk of the Superior Court was directed to make this entry: “Exceptions sustained, judgment for defendant, G. L. c. 231, § 122.” The plaintiff filed a motion in arrest of judgment. Summarily stated the contentions therein set forth are that G. L. c. 231, § 122, whereby the Supreme Judicial Court is empowered in certain circumstances to order judgment where at the trial a request for ruling that the plaintiff cannot…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Twining v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. BombolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. WardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Hacking v. Coӧrdinator of the Emergency Relief DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Paananen v. RhodesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1972
  4. Libby v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Dahl v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API