Legal Opinion

Gunn v. Burnette

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 10, 1960No. 17667PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stukes, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from the refusal of motion to dissolve the attachment of the defendant Ford Wrecker. In the statement in the transcript of record it is said that the individual defendant contracted to change two damaged tires upon plaintiff’s truck and in using the defendant wrecker to hoist plaintiff’s truck he operated the wrecker in a reckless, etc., manner causing damage to the truck. It was alleged in the complaint that the wrecker was being used to hoist plaintiff’s truck. We assume that the accident happened on a road or highway, although the record does not so…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Merchants & Planters Bank v. BrigmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
  2. State v. SullivanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  3. Gossett v. Van EgmondOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. White v. South Carolina Department of Parks, Recreation & TourismSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  2. Jack's Custom Cycles v. SCDORCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023
  3. Jack's Custom Cycles v. SCDORCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API