Legal Opinion

Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 27, 1953No. 16737PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Baker, Chief Justice.

The appellant is the owner and holder of a conditional sales contract, the conditions of which have been broken, covering one Fruehauf Furniture Van commonly known as a trailer, which trailer, while secured to and being drawn by a truck tractor, was attached and sold with the tractor, by the respondent under a separate action brought by respondent against the tractor and trailer under the provisions of section 8792 of the Code of 1942, as amended, section 45-551 of the Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1952, which statute provides for a lien on motor vehicles in favor of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. HallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Weston v. Carolina Research & Development FoundationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. González Tamayo v. Seatrain Lines of Puerto Rico, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1977
  3. Pacific Intermountain Express Co. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Goldston v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Faces Boutique, Ltd. v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API