Legal Opinion

Northern Assurance Co. of London v. Crawford

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 19, 1900PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to the County Court of Hays. Tried below before Hon. Ed. R. Kone.

1Opinion of the Court

KEY, Associate Justice.

This is a suit on a fire insurance policy. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant has appealed. The grounds of forfeiture were pleaded by the defendant, viz., keeping, using, and allowing gasoline in the house insured; and an increase of the hazard caused by using the house as a laundry, etc. ■

The clause in the policy prohibiting gasoline and other inflammable substances under penalty of forfeiture, is identical with the clause construed by this court in Insurance Company v. Green, 16 Texas Civil Appeals, 531, where it was held proper to admit proof of…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clements v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Royal Exch. Assur. v. ThrowerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1917
  4. Schaffer v. Hampton Farmers Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. Bitonti v. National Liberty Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API