Legal Opinion

McGovern v. City of Manchester

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 11, 1988No. 87-394PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The plaintiffs, who are neighbors of the intervenor, appeal the Trial Court’s (Pappagianis, J.) dismissal, on grounds of mootness, of their pending appeal, in which they attacked the *629validity of the city’s rezoning of the intervenor’s land. The plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred in dismissing their appeal without a hearing and that they are entitled on remand to a hearing and an opportunity to amend their pleadings. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

Both intervenors in the trial court, Paul Cowette and Peter Spiewak, own or control 260 acres…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCallum v. Inland Wetlands CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Town of Nottingham v. Lee Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  3. Thomas v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of BangorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. Hatcher v. Planning Board of NelsonvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Soares v. Town of AtkinsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blue Jay Realty Trust v. City of FranklinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API