Legal Opinion

Soares v. Town of Atkinson

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 28, 1987No. 84-589PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This case involves a challenge to the constitutionality of the Atkinson land use ordinances, which allegedly were exclusionary. The Superior Court {Gray, J.) approved a report of the Master {R. Peter Shapiro, Esq.) finding that the ordinances were unconstitutional and ordering the town to revise them appropriately. On appeal, after briefing and oral argument, we remanded the case for the limited purpose of having the master rule on whether a subsequent change in the ordinance made the constitutional claims moot. Soares v. Town of Atkinson, 128 N.H. 350, 512 A.2d 436 (1986). The master…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burrows v. City of KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  2. Treisman v. KamenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  3. Soares v. Town of AtkinsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Britton v. Town of ChesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  2. Caspersen v. Town of LymeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  3. Littky v. Winchester School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  4. In re JonesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  5. Community Resources for Justice, Inc. v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API