Legal Opinion

Medd v. BOYD WAGNER, INCORPORATED

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided June 10, 1955No. Civ. 7214PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLOEB, District Judge.

This is an action to restrain the unauthorized use of the trade name “Dairy Queen” and of the trade phrase “The Cone with the Curl on Top”.

Plaintiffs seek to prevent defendants, in the absence of consent of plaintiffs, from using the trade name “Dairy Queen” and the trade phrase “The Cone with the Curl on Top” in the vending of soft frozen ice milk, and from representing to the public that they are part of the “Dairy Queen” organization in Ohio and elsewhere vending “Dairy Queen” ice milk. The theory of the complaint is that the plaintiffs were exclusive owners in the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Scott Paper Co. v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Professional Golfers Association of America v. Bankers Life & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Advanced Interventional Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993
  3. McLeod v. CrawfordNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Ar-Tik Systems, Inc. v. Dairy Queen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  5. Riverbank Laboratories v. Hardwood Products Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API