Legal Opinion

Morrison v. First National Bank of Taos

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1922No. 2535PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

RAYNOLDS, C. J.

Appellant Morrison, as maker and endorser, was indebted to the First National Bank of Taos in the sum of $9,324.20 on four promissory notes. One Fortner was the maker of three of these notes and indorser on the fourth, which was signed by Morrison as maker. When the notes became due, payment was demanded by the bank, and an arrangement was entered into by the parties by which Morrison understood that on giving two new notes for $3,000 each he was to be released from his liability. The negotiations were carried on by Fortner and a representative of the bank.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Collins v. SchumpNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1911
  2. First Nat. Bank v. BakerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Kershner v. Trinidad Mill. & Min. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
  4. State v. OgdenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hogsett v. HannaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Ginn v. MacAlusoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Lindsey v. CranfillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Rogers v. BalduiniNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Hot Springs Nat. Bank v. KenneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API