Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Balduini

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1922No. 2574PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT

DAVIS, J.

At the close of plaintiff’s case in the trial court defendants moved for judgment on the ground that the proof was insufficient to authorize the relief asked, and this motion was granted. This was equivalent to a demurrer to the evidence which admits the truth of. the testimony, every conclusion which it tends to prove and every inference which may reasonably be drawn from it. Morrison v. First National Bank, 28 N. M. 129, 207 Pac. 62.

Appellant, plaintiff below, is the trustee of the estate of Isola Bambini, a bankrupt. He commenced this suit to set aside a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ginn v. HardySupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  2. California Consolidated Mining Co. v. ManleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Scoggin v. SchloathOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Morrison v. First National Bank of TaosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1922
  5. York v. LeverettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Paulos v. JanetakosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Merchants Bank v. DunnNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  3. In Re Garcia's EstateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Montoya v. DunlapNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API