Legal Opinion

John Brenton Preston v. Arthur Piggman

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 18, 1974No. 73-1859PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM E. MILLER, Circuit Judge.

Recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court have recognized that parole cannot be revoked without affording the parolee the procedural fairness guaranteed by the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment. Morissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972); Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed. 2d 656 (1973). On this appeal we are called upon to decide whether certain revocation procedures of the Kentucky Parole Board comply with this standard.

In March of 1971 the appellant was paroled from a life sentence…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. Rea Lyn SegalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. George E. Mack v. Gary McCune Warden, Federal Penitentiary, Leavenworth, and Maurice J. Sigler, Chairman, United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
  3. Gaddy v. MichaelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  4. Witzke v. WithrowDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1988
  5. William Lee Moss v. S. M. Patterson, Supt.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API