Legal Opinion
Brian McKnight v. Jacquelyn Wright
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided October 17, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00749Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 * * * 5 Brian McKnight, Case No. 2:25-cv-00749-DJA 6 Plaintiff, 7 Order v. 8 Jacquelyn Wright, 9 Defendant. 10 11 Before the Court is Plaintiff Brian McKnight’s motion to serve Defendant Jacquelyn 12 Wright via publication and to extend the time for service. (ECF No. 14). However, Plaintiff’s 13 motion has certain deficiencies. So, the Court denies it without prejudice. 14 I. Legal standard. 15 The Constitution does not require any particular means of service of process. Rio Props., 16 Inc. v. Rio Intern. Interlink,
284 F.3d 1007, 1017
(9th…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Direct Mail Specialists, Inc. v. Eclat Computerized Technologies, Inc., Dba Computerized TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Huling v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890