Legal Opinion

Huling v. Abbott

California Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1890No. 12909PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

— Action to foreclose a mortgage on a parcel of land situate in Humboldt County. Defendant Abbott was the mortgagor. Abbott made default, judgment of foreclosure was made and entered against defendants, and from this judgment defendant 'Bull alone prosecutes an appeal. The following facts are found: On July 7, 1885, Abbott was the owner of the tract of land which he, on the 28th of July, 1886, conveyed to plaintiff by mortgage to secure the payment of a debt due by Abbott to the plaintiff. Abbott’s title to *426this land was derived under a certificate of purchase from the state of California…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rose v. KnappCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Los Angeles Investment Co. v. TorchiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. (PS) Wade v. KernerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. Alpha Tech International LLC v. SkiverDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
  5. Brian McKnight v. Jacquelyn WrightDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API