Sutter's Place, Inc. v. Kennedy
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHARA, J.
The issue before us in this case is whether certain card games become illegal “percentage” games when the cardroom operator permits multiple bets by a single individual on a single hand and utilizes fee collection practices under which a fixed fee is collected for each bet within one monetary range and a higher fixed fee is collected for each bet within a higher monetary range. We conclude that such fee collection practices do not violate Penal Code section 330’s percentage game prohibition.
Background
Plaintiff has operated a 40-table cardroom in the City of San Jose since…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Methodist Hosp. of Sacramento v. SaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. SkinnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Amwest Surety Insurance v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Hays v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. PoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999