Legal Opinion

Howe v. Wilder

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 15, 1858PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, J.

This is a writ of entry, brought to recover possession of the demanded premises for the purpose of foreclosing the right of the defendant to redeem the same from a mortgage made by him to the plaintiff. By the production of the mortgage and of the promissory note which it was given to secure, it is conceded that he has shown all that is necessary to enable him to maintain this action, and that he ought to recover judgment therein, unless the defendant in his defence can avail himself of the title acquired by Rufus Hastings by the assignment made by the mortgagee to him. And this, we think,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marshall v. FiskMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  2. Commonwealth v. DudleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  3. Inhabitants of Conway v. Inhabitants of DeerfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  4. Glackan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
  5. Randall v. CleavelandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1827

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Culhane v. Aurora Loan ServicesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API