Glackan v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 5 — INDICTMENT— APPEALS PROM KENTON CIRCUIT, COURT. cited Wharton’s Amer. Grim. Law, sections 2144 to 2162; 1 Greenleaf Ev., sections 197, 198, 199, 200; 1 Stanton’s Revised Statutes, page 392.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIEF JUSTICE STITE&
delivered the opinion op the court:
The appellants were jointly indicted in the Kenton circuit court for having obtained property under false pretenses; and having been tried and convicted, have severally appealed to this court.
The two cases present, substantially, the same questions, and will therefore be considered together.
The grounds relied on for reversal are—
1. That the facts stated in the indictment do not constitute a public offense within the jurisdiction of the court; and that the court below erred in overruling the motion in arrest of judgment.
2. That error was…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. EyserSupreme Court of Colorado · 1873
- Commonwealth v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1894
- Commonwealth v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
- Whiton v. BalchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.