Legal Opinion

Moore v. Oser

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1933No. 7476PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Woods, Judge:

This is an action to recover $150.00, balance due for legal services rendered defendant, for one Tony Zeske, under an express contract with defendant. Plaintiff prosecutes error from a judgment based upon an adverse jury verdict. On a review of the case made on a former trial, this Court set aside a directed verdict for the defendant and remanded the case. Moore v. Oser, 112 W. Va. 208, 164 S. E. 144, on the theory that plaintiff was a gratuitous bailee, or mandatary, for the $150.00.

There is no substantial difference in the evidence adduced at the two trials. The issues are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parker v. National Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Lewis, Hubbard & Co. v. Montgomery Supply Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Chadister v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Moore v. OserWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rees Electric Co. v. Mullens Smokeless Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API