Legal Opinion
Moore v. Oser
West Virginia Supreme Court
Decided April 26, 1932No. 7177PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hatoher, President:
In this action plaintiff seeks to recover $150.00 as balance on an attorney’s fee. At the termination of the trial, the defendant moved for a directed verdict, wbicb motion was granted, and plaintiff secured a writ of error here.
Plaintiff’s testimony in relation to his demand is as follows:
“Mr. Oser came to my office to consult me about representing a man by the name of Tony Zeske. * * # He (Oser) explained to me that Zeske had been held'by Squire Clayton to answer for a second offense against the prohibition law, and that he had either that day gone on his bond or expected…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Walden v. KarrIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
- Chase v. GatesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1851
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ingersoll-Rand Financial Corp. v. NunleyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1981
- Moore v. OserWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933