Legal Opinion

Lewis, Hubbard & Co. v. Montgomery Supply Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1906PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Payette County'. Action by Lewis, Hubbard & Co. against the Montgomery Supply Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

POEFENBARGER, JUDGE:

A question of commercial law arises on this record. Lewis, Hubbard & Co., of the city of Charleston, doing a wholesale business in groceries, had, prior to the 24th day of September, 1900, sold goods to the Montgomery Supply Co., doing a retail grocery business in the town of Montgomery, and, on that day, there was due from said last mentioned concern the sum of $188.69. On that day W. G. Hubbard, a traveling *78salesman for Lewis, Hubbard & Co., was at Montgomery, called upon the Montgomery Supply Co., received from it, not earlier than four o’clock p. m. of that day, a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. HoughWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Burkhalter v. . the Second Nat. BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  3. Griffin v. KempIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Holmes v. RoeMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Cox v. BooneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1875

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cosden Pipe Line Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Marine National Bank of JacksonvilleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. Montsdoca v. Highlands Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1923
  4. Pinkney v. Kanawha Valley BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Blackwelder v. Fergus Motor Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API