Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Ins. v. Halcomb

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 4, 1935No. 7562PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment based on findings of an agreed special verdict of the jury and the court and its legal conclusions therefrom. Appellant insured the respondent administrator’s deceased intestate, George R. Halcomb, herein called the insured, against accidental death under a double indemnity provision making the company liable in the event “that death shall not have resulted from bodily injuries sustained while participating in aviation or aeronautics except as á fare paying passenger.”

The insured was killed in an airplane accident on a search for a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harris v. RunnelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. Levinson v. BoasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Wood v. KreppsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Gardner v. TatumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Hemmeon v. Amalgamated Copper Mines Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. O'Connell v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API