O'Connell v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
Action was brought by plaintiff, as beneficiary under a policy of insurance issued by defendant to plaintiffs deceased husband seeking recovery under a double indemnity provision incorporated in the policy. The case was tried by the court, sitting without a jury, upon a stipulation of facts. The court found the sole issue raised by the stipulation of facts in favor of the plaintiff and entered judgment in her favor and against the defendant in the amount of $5,000, from which defendant appeals. The sole issue presented on appeal is “whether plaintiff’s decedent was a ‘fare-paying passenger…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- G. C. Martin v. The Greyhound CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- Burns v. Mutual Ben. Life Ins. Co. of NewarkDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1948
- Krause v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
- Metropolitan Life Ins. v. HalcombCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brill v. Indianapolis Life InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1985