Legal Opinion

Flowerdale Greenhouses, Inc. v. McJunkin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 27, 1925No. 15644PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

This action was instituted by the defendant in error, as plaintiff,! against the plaintiff in error, as defendant.

The partes will bd referred to as plaintiff and defendant as they appeared im the trial court.

The action was one in mandamus to compel the transfer of certain shares of the capital stock of the Flowerdal^ Greenhouses, Inc., defendant, and was commenced by the Issuance of an alternative writ of mandamus.

Plaintiff, in his petition, upon which the alternative writ was issued, alleged, in substance, that the defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Citizens National Bank v. Consolidated Glass Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. State ex rel. McGill v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  3. Eberle v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. In re BallouDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1914
  5. Dennett v. Acme Manufacturing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. U.S. Cities Corporation v. SautbineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Flowerdale Greenhouses, Inc. v. McJunkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API