Legal Opinion

Faunce v. McCorkle

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1936No. Appeal, 351PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

This appeal is from judgment for plaintiffs on the pleadings in ejectment. Defendant has appealed.

Charles Rotherham, owning land in Philadelphia, on March 23, 1927, executed and delivered a written instrument to appellant designating him “trustee” to sell the land “at or about the price given my trustee by me, and to distribute all the proceeds to myself, otherwise according to my instructions.” On March 26, 1927, Rotherham conveyed the property to the appellant by deed delivered to him. On its face the conveyance was absolute. The land has not been sold. On July…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lilley's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Kauffman v. KauffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Bacon's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  4. Dyer's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  5. Maffitt's Administrator v. Rynd ex rel. LambSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Metzger v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Sferra v. UrlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Williams Et Ux. v. MoodhardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Shaffer v. ShafferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Dupuy's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API