Legal Opinion

In Re Guardianship of Stanger

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 5, 1974No. 44323PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

217 N.W.2d 754 (1974)

In re GUARDIANSHIP OF William S. STANGER, et al,

Ervin HARTMANN, et al, Appellants,

v.

Henry M. WHITEMAN, guardian, Respondent.

No. 44323.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

April 5, 1974.

Firestone, Fink, Krawetz, Miley & Maas, William W. Fink, and Kenneth J. Maas, Jr., St. Paul, for appellants.

Dougherty & Scott, and Kenneth E. Scott, Fairmont, for respondent.

Heard before KNUTSON, C. J., and OTIS, MacLAUGHLIN, and MULALLY, JJ., and considered and decided by the court.

2Per curiam

In April 1970, William S. Stanger, the paternal grandfather of the minor children involved in these guardianship…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Swick v. SheridanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Prokosch v. BrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. In Re Guardianship of DahmenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  5. Hartmann v. WhitemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Conservatorship of FosterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Schmidt v. HebeisenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. In Re Conservatorship of LundgaardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  4. In Re Guardianship of KowalskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  5. In Re the Guardianship of FingerholtzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API