Legal Opinion
Pearson v. McGraw
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 4, 1939No. 69PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
Hayes, respondents’ decedent, died testate in 1936 and was at the time of his death a resident of and domiciled in Oregon. In earlier years when he had resided in the middle west he placed in possession of an Illinois trust company various stocks, bonds and other intangibles, which trust company acted as his agent in collecting principal and income on those securities and in the investment of his funds. ; When decedent established a domicile in Oregon in 1933, he .continued that arrangement with the Illinois trust company, with the result that those securities were always physically present…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Burnet v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Curry v. McCanlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Minnesota Tea Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Blodgett v. SilbermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Patterson v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Miller Brothers Co. v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Helvering v. Le GierseSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Greenough v. Tax Assessors of NewportSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Tharalson v. State Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1978
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.