Legal Opinion

Speck v. Anderson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1982No. 13054PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN Chief Justice (on reassignment).

This is an action for specific performance of an option agreement to purchase certain real estate. The trial court granted appellee’s motion for summary judgment. 1 We reverse and remand.

Appellants, Donald and Joan Speck (Specks), operate a farming and ranching operation in Buffalo County, South Dakota. George Anderson (appellee) is the only son of Howard and Wilma Anderson. As a young man, appellee left home and moved to California.

As he grew older and his wife’s health began to deteriorate, Howard Anderson became less interested in actively farming…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Estate of Dutard v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Schutterle v. SchutterleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Renner v. CrismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Estate of Girard v. LairdSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  2. Osloond v. FarrierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Gunn v. GunnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Johnson v. SellersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Speck v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API