Legal Opinion

Hazel Hurst Foundation v. Eames

California Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1958No. L. A. 24410PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Two appeals from an order determining heirship and the judgment entered thereon are here involved and will be considered separately insofar as practicable.

There is no dispute concerning the facts. Nellie Neubauer executed a formal will on September 9, 1954. Her attorney retained the original and at her own request Mrs. Neubauer executed a duplicate which she retained in her possession. The will, which consisted of four pages, contained certain specific bequests which are not involved here. In the will Mrs. Neubauer directed her executor to pay to her husband the sum of $250 per month during…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Salmonski v. BardzinskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Thornagel v. PforrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Estate of PlautCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Estate of DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McQuarrie v. KuttlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Gardner v. BalboniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Estate of SandersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Montegani v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API