Legal Opinion

Buffalo Insurance Co. v. Steinberg

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 16, 1962No. 39162PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge.

The defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is based upon the contention that there was no compliance with the terms of the policy relating to time of filing of proof of loss and of filing suit, and the terms of the contract prevent any action being maintained on the policy. In response the plaintiff contends that the insurer waived the provision of the policy concerning the time for filing the proof of loss and that the circumstances in the case concerning the presumption of death of the insured, together with the time required for appointment of a conservator…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. New York Underwriters Insurance v. NolesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  2. Sentinel Fire Insurance v. McRobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Dean v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  4. Southern Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  5. Pilgrim Health & Life Insurance v. ChismCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Boston Old Colony InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Livaditis v. American Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. Beck v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. SampleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. Maurie H. Berman v. The Palatine Insurance Company, Limited, the Home Insurance Company, Androchester American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API