Legal Opinion
Kuzma v. Kaczur Et Ux.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 21, 1966No. 20,011PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBierly, J.
This action was commenced by the appellees, hereinafter called plaintiffs, for damages resulting from a conveyance of real estate wherein the plaintiffs allege that they were fraudulently deprived of their interest in the real estate so conveyed.
Issues were joined by pleading paragraphs one (1) and three (3) of plaintiffs’ amended complaint and the answer in denial filed by appellants — hereinafter called defendants— in compliance with Rule 1-3 of the Supreme Court.
The issues presented for trial were:
1. What was the interest, if any, of plaintiffs, Gregory Kaczur and Anne Kaczur, in and to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dorsey Machine Co. v. McCaffreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Farm Bureau Mutual Ins. Co. v. Seal, Admr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1962
- Badgley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
- Grimm v. BaumgartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
- Daly v. ShowersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Grissom v. MoranIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- CITY OF GARY, ETC. v. RubertoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- CITY OF GARY, ETC. v. RubertoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Kuzma v. Kaczur Et Ux.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1966
- Kuzma v. Kaczur Et Ux.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1966